Modelling of the Exchange Rate Volatility and Uncertainty Impacts on Agriculture Import: Evidence from Iran

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor of Agricultural and Food Policy Research Group, Research Institute for Planning, Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Tehran, Iran.

10.22103/jdc.2022.18146.1154

Abstract

Objective: Although most business models argue that exchange rate volatility increase uncertainty and risk, thereby reducing trade flows and imports; however, some other studies show the opposite results. Although many studies have been conducted on the exchange rate on trade and specifically on imports in the world, but the non-linear and asymmetric effect of exchange rate fluctuations and uncertainty on agricultural imports in Iran remains unknown. Therefore, this article tries to test the absence or asymmetry in possible photos of agricultural imports due to exchange rate changes in the Iranian economy. In addition, this study provides empirical evidence to advance policy-making in exchange rate management, as exchange rate uncertainties affect trade, and the results of this study provide information that can guide and develop the literature on the subject. The present study has examined the effect of market exchange rate uncertainty (unofficial) on the import of Iran's agricultural sector in the period 2001-2016.
 Method: Exponential generalized conditional heterogeneity variance (EGARCH) model for deriving exchange rate volatility and conditional variance for estimating exchange rate uncertainty and two methods of Autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) and Non-linear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) to estimate the effect of volatility and uncertainty agricultural imports.
 Findings: The results indicate that the market exchange rate always has a positive and increasing effect on the value of imports in the agricultural sector (which is mainly input of agriculture production). In addition, examining the nonlinear relationship between exchange rate uncertainty and agricultural imports shows that positive shocks (increasing) of uncertainty has a decreasing effect on agricultural imports and negative shocks (decreasing) of uncertainty has an increasing effect on agricultural imports. Examining the linear relationship between exchange rate fluctuations and agricultural sector imports shows that current level of fluctuations do not have a significant effect on agricultural sector imports, but after a lag level (past period), it has a significant but positive weak effect on agricultural sector imports. Finally, by examining the long-term and short-term model between these two variables, no significant relationship was observed.
Examination of the linear relationship between exchange rate fluctuations and agricultural sector imports shows that current exchange rate fluctuations do not have a significant effect on agricultural sector imports, but the previous period has a positive, significant and weak effect on agricultural sector imports. Examining the long-term and short-term relationships of these two variables, no significant relationship was observed. This is while the real free market exchange rate still has a positive effect on imports. However, this study on the effect of exchange rates is in line with most domestic and foreign studies and confirms their results.
The results of research in modeling of effect of currency fluctuations on agricultural imports show that the effect of currency fluctuations on imports is symmetrical and currency fluctuations with a lag period have a positive and weak effect on imports. In the long run, the positive shock of currency fluctuations has not had a significant effect on agricultural imports. Also, 96% of short-term and long-term imbalances are adjusted in the pattern of the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on agricultural imports. Due to the high speed of adjustment, if positive currency shocks are managed, its negative effects will be adjusted after a period. Free market exchange rate has a significant and positive effect on the value of agricultural imports. GDP and prices and trade liberalization have a significant and positive effect on agricultural imports.
 Conclusion: Exchange rate uncertainty should be considered as an important issue by economic policy makers to reduce risk of trade flows. It is recommended to use exchange rate risk coverage tools, clarify government foreign exchange policies to reduce the risk of exchange rate fluctuations and uncertainty to ensure a continuous flow of agricultural import inputs. Exchange rate has always been considered as a key and important economic variable in policy making. It is recommended to use exchange rate risk hedging tools, clarify government foreign exchange policies to reduce the risk of exchange rate fluctuations and uncertainty to ensure a continuous flow of agricultural import inputs.
In conditions of volatile and risky currency, the devaluation of the national currency (exchange rate increase) causes an increase in the value of imports in the agricultural sector, which indicates the management of foreign exchange expenditures on agricultural imports in line with government sovereign duties.
The import of the agricultural sector reacts to the illegal market exchange rate rather than reacting to the uncertainty and riskiness of the exchange rate, and this high rate of adjustment, if positive exchange rate shocks are managed, its negative effects are adjusted after a period. In addition, high-risk currency conditions increase incentives and competition in the import of the agricultural sector, and the high sensitivity of agricultural imports to the illegal market exchange rate confirms this result. The behavior pattern of exchange rate (linear and nonlinear/ symmetric or asymmetric) and choosing a illegal market exchange rate instead of government and official exchange rates is effective in analyzing the impact of exchange rates on imports.
Finally, there are many changes and fluctuations in the Iranian economy, it is suggested that, firstly, by formulating appropriate policies and strategies to stabilize the exchange rate and increase trade, the field of controlling and adjusting currency uncertainties be provided to witness this. Increase production, exports and improve the trade balance.

Keywords

Main Subjects


ابوالحسن بیگی، هانا و مهدوی، ابوالقاسم (1398). رابطه نرخ ارز با تراز تجاری ایران تحت شرایط نااطمینانی (رویکرد غیرخطی). مطالعات اقتصادی کاربردی ایران، 8(32)، 17-1.
افسری بادی، رضا؛ نائب یزدی، آرش و معافی، سیده فاطمه (1398). اثر نوسانات نرخ ارز بر تجارت ایران با شش کشور اصلی. فصلنامه سیاست‌های مالی و اقتصادی، 7(25)، 25-7.
اقبالی، علیرضا؛ حلافی، حمیدرضا و گسگری، ریحانه (1383). انحراف نرخ ارز واقعی و رشد اقتصادی در اقتصاد ایران. پژوهشنامه اقتصادی، 4(14)، 188-167.
الیاسپور، بهنام؛ احمدی شادمهری، محمدطاهر؛ لطف علیپور، محمدرضا و فلاحی، محمدعلی (1397). تأثیر نااطمینانی نرخ ارز بر تراز تجاری ایران رهیافت الگوی تلاطم تصادفی نامتقارن. پژوهشنامه بازرگانی، 88(22)، 255-207.
آشنا، ملیحه و لعل خضری، حمید (1400). همبستگی پویای نوسان نرخ ارز، صادرات و واردات با نااطمینانی سیاست اقتصادی جهانی (کاربرد الگوی M-GARRCH  رهیافت .(DCC فصلنامه مطالعات اقتصادی کاربردی ایران، 10(37)، 167-135.
توکلی، اکبر وسیاح، محسن (1389). تأثیر نوسانات نرخ ارز بر فعالیت‌های اقتصادی کشور. فصلنامه پول و اقتصاد، 3(2)، 77-59.
زمانی، فهیمه و مهرابی بشرآبادی، حسین (1393). بررسی اثر نوسانات نرخ ارز بر تجارت محصولات کشاورزی در ایران، فصلنامه علمی -پژوهشی تحقیقات اقتصاد کشاورزی، 6 (22)، 28-13.
شافعی، سیما؛ بستان، یدالله؛ فتاحی اردکانی، احمد؛ جهانگیرپور، درنا و عرفانی مقدم، رحمان (1399). پیش‌بینی و بررسی اثر نااطمینانی نرخ ارز حقیقی بر واردات بخش کشاورزی ایران. فصلنامه علمی -پژوهشی تحقیقات اقتصاد کشاورزی، 12(47)، 150-120.
فتحی، فاطمه و قربانیان، عفت (1400). مدیریت ریسک واردات ذرت دامی ایران. اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، 35(2)، 191-179.
لعل خضری، حمید و جعفری صمیمی، احمد (1399). تأثیر نامتقارن تکانه‌های نرخ ارز بر توزیع درآمد در ایران: رویکرد.NARDL  اقتصاد مالی، 14(53)، 64-45.
مهرابی بشرآبادی، حسین و جاودان، ابراهیم (1390). تأثیر نااطمینانی نرخ ارز واقعی بر رشد بخش کشاورزی در ایران .فصلنامه علمی -پژوهشی تحقیقات اقتصاد کشاورزی، 3(9)، 46-27.
References
Abolhasanbeigi, H., & Mahdavi, A. (2020). The effect of exchange rate on Iranian trade balance under uncertainty. Journal of Applied Economics Studies in Iran, 8(32), 1-17 [In Persian].
Afsari Badi R., Nayeb Yazdi A., & Moafi S.F. (2019). The effect of exchange rate volatility on Iran’s bilateral trade in six major countries. Quarterly Journal of Fiscal and Economics Policies, 7(25), 7-29 [In Persian].
Aguerre, R.B., Fuertes, A.M., & Phylaktis, K. (2012). Exchange rate pass-through into import prices revisited. Journal of International Money, 31, 818-844.
Arize, A.C., Osang, T., & Slottje, D.J. (2000). Exchange-rate volatility and foreign trade: Evidence from thirteen LDC's. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 18(1), 10-17.
Ashena, M., & Laal khezri, H. (2021). Dynamic correlation of exchange rate, export and import volatility with the global economic policy uncertainty index (Application of M-GARRCH and DCC Approach). Journal of Applied Economics Studies in Iran, 10(37), 135-167 [In Persian].
Asteriou, D., Masatci, K., & Pilbeam, K. (2016). Exchange rate volatility and international trade: International evidence from the MINT countries. Economic Modelling, 58, 133-140.
Auboin, A., & Ruta, M., (2013). The Relationship between exchange rates and international trade: A literature Review. World Trade Review, 12(3), 577–605.
Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Arize, A.C. (2020). On the asymmetric effects of exchange rate volatility on trade flows: evidence from Africa. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 56(4), 913-939.
Baum, C.F., & Çağlayan, M. (2010). On the sensitivity of the volume and volatility of bilateral trade flows to exchange rate uncertainty, Journal of International Money and Finance, 29(1), 79-93.
Chit, M.M., Rizov, M., & Willenbockel, D. (2010). Exchange rate volatility and exports: new empirical evidence from the emerging East Asian economies. World Economy, 33(2), 239-263.
Constantinescu, C., Mattoo, A., & Ruta, M. (2020). Policy uncertainty, trade and global value chains: Some facts, many questions. Review of Industrial Organization, 57(2), 285-308.
Doğanlar, M. (2002). Estimating the impact of exchange rate volatility on exports: evidence from Asian countries. Applied Economics Letters, 9(13), 859-863.
Eghbali, A., Halafi, H., & Gasgari, R. (2004). Real exchange rate deviation and economic growth in the Iranian economy. Journal of Economic Research, 4(14), 167-188 [In Persian].
Elyaspour, B., Ahmadi shadmehri, M., Lotfalipour, M., & Falahi, M. (2018). The effect of exchange rate uncertainty on the trade balance of Iran: The asymmetric stochastic volatility model. Iranian Journal of Trade Studies, 22(88), 207-255 [In Persian].
Fathi, F., & Ghorbanian, E. (2021). Risk management of Iran’s corn import. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 35(2), 179-191 [In Persian].
Fofanah, P. (2020). Effects of exchange rate volatility on trade: Evidence from West Africa. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 12(3), 32-52.
Granger C.W., & Yoon G. )2002(. Hidden Cointegration, University of California, Working Paper
Hall, S.G.H., Swamy, P., Tavlas, G., & Ulas, M. (2010). Exchange rate volatility and export performance: do emerging market economies resemble industrialized countries or other developing countries? Economic Modelling, 27(6), 1514-1521
Junttila, J., & Korhonen, M. (2012). The role of inflation regime in the exchange rate pass-through to import prices. International Review of Economics & Finance, 24, 88-96.
Lal-Khezri, H., & Jafari-Samimi, A. (2020). Asymmetric effect of exchange rate shocks on income distribution in Iran: NARDL approach. Financial Economics, 14(53), 45-65 [In Persian].
Mehrabi Boshrabadi, H., & Naghavi, S. (2011). Estimating energy demand in agricultural sector of Iran. Agricultural Economics Research, 3(10), 147-162 [In Persian].
Oskooee, B.M., & Hegerty, S.W. (2007). Exchange rate volatility and trade flows: A review article. Journal of Economic Studies, 34(3), 211-255.
Shafei, S., bostan, Y., Fatahiardakani, A., Jahangirpor, D., & Erfani, R. (2020). Predicting and studying the effect of uncertainty in the real exchange rate on the agricultural department imports of Iran. Agricultural Economics Research, 12(47), 125-150 [In Persian].
Sharma, C., & Pal, D. (2019). Does exchange rate volatility dampen imports? Commodity-level evidence from India. International Economic Journal, 33(4), 696-718.
Sharma, C., & Paramati, S.R. (2021). Does economic policy uncertainty dampen imports? Commodity-level evidence from India. Economic Modelling, 94(C), 139-149.
Shin Y., Yu B., & Greenwood-Nimmo M.J. )2011(. Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ardl framework. Available at SSRN: http:ssrn.com.abstract=1807745 or http:dx.doi.org.10.2139.ssrn.1807745.
Sun, C., Kim, M., Koo, W., Cho, G. & Jin, H. (2002). The effect of exchange rate volatility on wheat trade worldwide, Working Paper, Center for Agricultural Policy and Trade Studies. (No. 1187-2016-93730).
Tavakoli, A., & Sayah, M. (2010). The impact of exchange rate fluctuations on economic activities in Iran. Journal of Monetary & Banking Research, 3(2), 59-77 [In Persian].
Yakub, M.U., Sani, Z., Obiezue, T.O., & Aliyu, V.O. (2019). Empirical investigation on exchange rate volatility and trade flows in Nigeria. Economic and Financial Review, 57(1), 23-46.
Zamani, F., & Mehrabi Boshrabadi, H. (2014). The effects of exchange rate volatility on agricultural trade in Iran. Agricultural Economics Research, 6(22), 13-28 [In Persian].