Analyzing Impact of Institutional Variables on Iran’s Macroeconomic Structure (With an Emphasis on Economic Freedom Indictor)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D Student, Department of Economics, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.

2 Professor of Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

3 Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.

10.22103/jdc.2022.19128.1213

Abstract

Objective: Experience of countries with different institutional structures shows that they achieved different development goals. This phenomenon is doubly important in countries with natural resources, such as oil. There are differences in the theoretical and experimental results of the effects of the abundance of natural resources on the growth rate of a developing economy. While some oil-exporting countries have high economic growth, in others implementation of development policies has not only strengthened economic growth, but also further problems such as inadequate resource allocation, increased consumption, waste of resources, economic corruption, government budget imbalances occurred. oil revenues in high institutional quality countries controlled by the macroeconomic structure; however, in countries with low institutional quality, it destroys the macroeconomic structure, which occurs in the turmoil of important economic variables.
This article seeks to investigate the two-way effect of economically significant variables and institutional variables on each other. In this regard, first, a macroeconomic model for a developing country that exports a product introduced, and then this model modified based on theoretical considerations and the main features of the Iranian economy. Given that, economic freedom is a good indicator for measuring the institutional quality of countries, it used as an alternative to institutional framework. The economic freedom index of the Fraser Institute implemented as an endogenous institutional variable in the model.
 Method: This study is based on the analysis of time series data for the period of 1972-2020 in Iran. The fact that improving income in a country may improve institutions internalizes the institutional structure, leading to measurement error, inverse causality, and false correlation, and will distort the model estimation. In such a condition, appropriate econometric methods must be implemented to eliminate these problems. One of the suitable econometric methods to reduce the problem of endogenousity of institutional indicators and correlations between institutional variables and other explanatory variables is GMM (Generalize Method of Moments), which implemented in this article. The model has seven main equations for different economic sectors and sub-indexes of Economic freedom implemented in different equations based on the compatibility with that equation.
 Results: Consumption function estimation shows that past consumption level has a large effect on current consumption, which confirms the effect of consumption function gears. The positive relationship between consumption and interest rates shows that an increase in interest rates, increases consumption, which is a result of the increasing inflation in the country. The institutional index of healthy (stable) money includes liquidity growth, freedom of ownership of foreign currencies, current inflation rate and inflation change in the last five years and has had a negative effect on consumption. in the investment equation, size of government, national income and interest rates had the greatest impact on investment, respectively. The negative exchange rate coefficient is due to the relationship between the exchange rate and investment, which can be attributed to the fact that in oil-rich countries such as Iran, the bulk of imported capital goods and rising exchange rates make capital goods more expensive and reduce investment. In the export function, foreign income has the greatest effect and a significant relationship between exports and relative prices confirmed. In this equation, the effect of the institutional variable is significant, which confirms the researcher's views. According to the results, low export price elasticity and high export revenue elasticity in Iran can be justified. Because Iran's main export is oil, which mostly influenced by the level of production and income of other countries, and due to the exogenous mechanism of determining international oil price, is not dependent on changes in the country's exchange rate.
In the import equation, national income has the greatest effect, and the income elasticity of imports indicates the country's strong dependence on imported goods and the considerable volume of essential goods and services in the country's imports. The effect of oil revenue in the model is significant but its sign is contrary to expectations, as it shows that despite the decline in oil revenue, imports have increased. This evidence suggests that Iran has not been able to implement an import substitution strategy. The positive effect of the institutional variable on imports shows that with the improvement of the foreign trade freedom situation, the country's imports increase.
In the production function, the institutional variable of property rights was not significant, but the institutional variable of laws and regulations had an effect on national production, which shows the direct effect of improving the status of laws and regulations and reducing bureaucracy on increasing production. The ratio of imports to capital accumulation has had a positive effect on the level of production, which confirms the results of estimating the import function based on the high share of essential goods in the country's imports.
In the money demand function, an increase in national income has increased liquidity, which explains the larger monetary sector compared to the real sector. Increasing oil revenues also increase the volume of liquidity. The institutional variable of government expenditure is marked in agreement with the theory. Changes in the institutional variable of healthy (stable) money also increase the volume of liquidity. It is empheasized again that one of the components of the healthy money index is inflation in recent years, which has not been favorable in Iran and has increased liquidity. The designed institutional function is able to explain the institutional changes of the, and the sign of all coefficients agrees the expected sign. The increase in national income improves the country's institutions, while the increase in other variables such as government size, oil revenue, liquidity volume and inflation has destroyed the country's institutional situation, which government size and inflation have had the greatest impact on the institutional situation.
 Conclusion: Estimation of institutional function also shows that increasing national income has improved the country's institutions, while increasing other variables such as government size; oil revenue; liquidity and inflation have destroyed the country's institutional situation. Meanwhile improving the quality of institutions leads to an increase in national production and reduces the volume of liquidity.

Keywords

Main Subjects


آقاصفری، حنانه؛ امینی زاده، میلاد و کرباسی، علیرضا (1397). بررسی نقش نهادها و زیر ساخت‌ها بر تجارت دوجانبه ایران با شرکای عمده تجاری. پژوهش‌های رشد و توسعه اقتصادی، 9(35)، 78-53.
افراسیابی، مهران؛ پهلوانی، مصیب و حسین‌زاده، رمضان (1399). بررسی اثردرآمدهای نفت بر همگرایی منطقه‌ای در اقتصاد ایران: رهیافت اقتصادسنجی فضایی. مجله توسعه و سرمایه، 5(2)، 16-1.
توفیقی، حمید و یحیوی رازلیقی، حسن (1395). تأثیر رانت نفتی بر کیفیت نهادها در اقتصادهای نفتی. سیاستگذاری اقتصادی، 8(16)، 41-21.
دفتر مطالعات محیط کسب و کار (1390). بررسی و نقد شاخص‌های جهانی آزادی اقتصادی (بنیار هریتیج و مؤسسه فریزر). مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی، 33-1.
سالوارتوره، دومینیک (1393). اقتصاد بین‌الملل. ترجمه حمیدرضا ارباب، نشر نی، 638-1.
شاکری، محبوبه؛ جعفری صمیمی، احمد و کریمی‌موغاری، زهرا (1394). ارتباط بین متغیرهای نهادی و رشد اقتصادی: معرفی شاخص نهادی جدید برای خاورمیانه و شمال آفریقا. پژوهش‌های رشد و توسعه اقتصادی، 6(21)، 116-94.
عجم اوغلو، دارون و رابینسون، جیمز (1393). چرا کشورها شکست می‌خورند؟ ترجمه: محسن پویا جبل عاملی و محمدرضا فرهادی‌پور، تهران: انتشارات دنیای اقتصاد، تهران.
عیسی‌زاده، سعید و احمدزاده، اکبر (1388). بررسی اثر عوامل نهادی بر رشد اقتصادی با تأکید بر نهادهای حاکمیتی (مطالعه موردی بین کشوری برای دوره 2005-1996). پژوهش‌های اقتصادی ایران، 13(40)، 28-1.
قابل‌رحمت، فاطمه؛ فتحی، سروش؛ توسلی رکن‌آبادی، مجید و مرشدی زاد، علی (1397). درآمدی بر پیکره‌بندی نابرابری با تأکید بر نهادهای اقتصادی و سیاسی در بستر توسعه: ارائه یک مدل مفهومی. مطالعات توسعه اجتماعی ایران، 11(1)، 87-77.
متوسلی، محمود (1382). توسعه اقتصادی، مفاهیم، مبانی نظری ، رویکرد نهادگرایی و روش شناسی. تهران: انتشارات سمت. ص 123.
مشهدی احمد، محمود (1392). معنا و مفهوم نهاد در اقتصاد نهادگرا نگاهی به اختلافات موجود بین نهادگرایی قدیم و جدید و نقش نهادها در مناسبات اقتصادی. پژوهشنامه اقتصادی رویکرد اسلامی ایرانی، 13(48)، 77-49.
معینی فرد، مژگان و مهرآرا، محسن (1394).تأثیر وفور منابع طبیعی بر کیفیت حکمرانی کشورهای در حال توسعه. سیاستگذاری پیشرفت اقتصادی، 3(9)، 32-9.
منشادی، محمددهقان؛ اسلاملوییان، کریم؛ هادیان، ابراهیم و دهقان شبانی، زهرا (1399).  اثر کیفیت نهادی بر چرخه تجاری و پویایی‌های متغیرهای کلان اقتصادی در ایران. اقتصاد و الگوسازی، 11(1)، 66-29.
منصورآبادی، شیما و خداپرست شیرازی، جلیل (1398). اثر وفور منابع طبیعی بر رشد اقتصادی و نقش کیفیت نهادها. تحقیقات اقتصاد کشاورزی، 11(1)، 192-175.
منصورلکورج، کیانوش؛ بختیاری کوهسرخی، صادق و قبادی، سارا (1400). تأثیرمتغیرهای نهادی و فرهنگی در جذب سرمایه‌گذاری مستقیم خارجی و رشد اقتصادی (مورد مطالعه: منتخبی ازکشورهای در حال توسعه). مجله توسعه و سرمایه، آماده انتشار.
نورث، داگلاس سی (1384). درک فرایند تغییر اقتصادی. فصلنامه علمی تخصصی تکاپو. ترجمه علی نصیری اقدم، شماره 11 و 12، 178-171.
وبلن، تورستین (1383). نظریه طبقه مرفه، ترجمه فرهنگ ارشاد، تهران، نشر نی، ص 209.
هایک، فردریش فون (1393). قانون‌گذاری و آزادی (جلد 3: نظم سیاسی مردمان آزاد). ترجمه موسی غنی نژاد و مهشید معیری، انتشارات دنیای اقتصاد.
یزدان‌شناس باحقوق، مهدی؛ خلیلی، فرزانه؛ افشاری‌راد، مجید و هاشمی دیزج، عبدالرحیم (1400). اثر غیرخطی نهادها و وفور منابع طبیعی بر رشد اقتصادی هشت کشور اسلامی در حال توسعه (رهیافت الگوی انتقال ملایم در داده‌های تابلویی).  مجله توسعه و سرمایه، آماده انتشار.
References
Abere, S.S., & Akinbobola, T.O. (2020). External shocks, institutional quality, and macroeconomic performance in Nigeria. SAGE Open. April-June 2020: pp 1–18.
Afonso, Ó., Almeida, I., & Fortuna, N. (2021). Impact of institutions on economic growth across OECD countries. Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, 6, 654-674.
Afrasiabi, M., Pahlavani, M., & Hosseinzadeh, R. (2021). Investigating the effect of oil revenue on regional convergence in Iran: (Spatial econometric approach). Journal of Development and Capital, 5(2), 1-16. Doi: 10.22103/jdc.2020.15908.1094 [In Persian].
Aghasafari, H., Aminizadeh, M., & Karbasi, A. (2019). Investigating the Roles of Institutions and Infrastructure on Iran’s Bilateral Trade with Main Trading Partners. Economic Growth and Development Research, 9(35), 53-78. Doi: 10.30473/egdr.2019.40359.4834 [In Persian]
Anil, A., & Gabor, P. (2021). Macroeconomic impact of structural reforms in Ukraine. International monetary fund. Working Paper, European Department, 100, 37.
Assali, M. (1996). A macroeconomic model for a developing country: Estimation and simulation of a macroeconometric model for Iran (1959-1933). Ph.D Dissertation, Durham University.
Bernardelli, M., Prochniak, M., & Witkowski, B. (2021). Time stability of the impact of institutions on economic growth and real convergence of the EU countries: Implications from the hidden Markov models analysis. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 6(2), 85-323.
Menshadi, M., Eslamloueyan, K., Hadian, E., & Dehghan Shabani, Z. (2020). The Effect of Institutional Quality on Business Cycle and the Dynamics of Macroeconomic Variables in Iran. Journal of Economics and Modeling, 11(1), 29-66 [In Persian].
Dieng, A.K., & Camara, A. (2021). Financial development, institutions and economic growth in WAEMU countries. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 13(8), 1-40.
Ershad Hussain, M., & Haque, M. (2016). Impact of economic freedom on the growth rate: A panel data analysis. Economies, 4(2), 1-5.
Ghabel rahmat, F., fathi, S., Tavasoli Roknabadi, M., & Morshedizad, A. (2018). An introduction on the configuration of inequality by Emphasizing economic and political institutions in the context of development: Provide a conceptual model. Journal of Iranian Social Development Studies, 11(1), 77-87. [In Persian]
Greene, W.H. (2008). Econometric analysis, sixth edition. New Jersey, Upper Saddle River: Pearson International. pp 83–116.
Hague, N. Lahiri K. & Montiel P.J (1990). A macroeconometric model for developing countrie. IMF Staff Paper, 37(3), 537-559.
Harper, C., Jones, N., & Watson, C. (2012). Gender justice for adolescent girls: Tackling social institutions. Shaping policy for development. ODI Publishing, May 2012, pp 14.
Isa Zadeh, S., & Ahmadzadeh, A. (2009). Institution, Governance, and Economic Growth (Text in Persian). Iranian Journal of Economic Research, 13(40), 1-28. [In Persian]
Kiani, K.H. (1992). The estimation of aggregate consumption function in Iran. Eghtesad (Economics), 1, 5-28.
Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251-267.
Malanski, L., Köppe, S.P., & Angela, C. (2021). Economic growth and corruption in emerging markets: Does economic freedom matter? The Journal of International Economics, 166, 58-70.
Mansoor Lakoraj, K., Bakhtiari, S., & Ghobadi, S. (2022). The Impact of Institutional and Cultural Variables on Attracting Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Development (a selection of developing countries). Journal of Development and Capital, doi: 10.22103/jdc.2022.18347.1163 [In Persian].
Mashhadi Ahmad, M. (2013). The Meaning and Concept of Institutions in Institutionalism A Look at Differences between Old and New Institutionalism and the Role of Institutions in Economic Activities. Economics Research, 13(48), 49-77. [In Persian]
Mehlam, H., Moene, K., & Torvik, R. (2005). Cursed by resources or institutions? The World Economy, 116, 1-20.
Median Moral, E., & Montes-Gan, V.J. (2018). Economic freedom, good governance and the dynamics of development. The Journal of Applied Economics, 21(1), 44-66.
Moeinifard, M., & Mehrara, M. (2015). Effect of Abundance of Natural Resources on Governance Guality in Developing Countries. Economic Development Policy, 3(4), 9-32. Doi: 10.22051/edp.2017.7617.1016 [In Persian]
Rigobon, R., & Rodrik, D. (2005). Rule of law, democracy, openness and income. Economics of Transition, 13(3), 533–564.
Shakeri, M., Jafari Samimi, A., & Karimi Moughari, Z. (2015). The Relationship between Institutional Variables and Economic Growth: Introducing a New Institutional Measure for Middle East and North Africa (MENA). Economic Growth and Development Research, 6(21), 106-93. [In Persian].
Tofighi, H., & Yahyavi Razlighi, H. (2016). The Effect of Oil rents on the Institutional Quality in Oil-Based Economies. The Journal of Economic Policy, 8(16), 21-40. [In Persian].
Veblen, T. (1909). The limitation of marginal utility. The Journal of Political Economoy, 17(9), 626-628.
Yazdanshenas Bahoghogh, M., Khalili, F., afshari rad, M., & Hashemi Dizaj, A. (2021). The Non-Linear Effects of Good Governance Index and Natural Recourses Abundance on Economic Growth in D8 Countries (Smoothing Transition Regression in Panel Data). Journal of Development and Capital, doi: 10.22103/jdc.2021.18367.1164 [In Persian].
Office of Business Environment Studies (2016). Reviewing and criticizing global indicators of economic freedom (Heritage Foundation and Fraser Institute). Islamic Council Research Center, 1-33 [In Persian].
Salvartore, D. (2014). International economy. Translated by Hamidreza Arbab, Ney Publishing, 1-638 [In Persian].
Motevaseli, M. (2003). Economic development, concepts, theoretical foundations, institutional approach and methodology. Tehran: Samit Publications [In Persian].
Mashhadi, Ahmad, M. (2012). The meaning and concept of institution in institutionalist economics, a look at the existing differences between old and new institutionalism and the role of institutions in economic relations. Economic. Journal of Iranian Islamic Approach, 13(48), 77-49 [In Persian].
Mansoorabadi, Sh., & Khodaparast Shirazi, J. (2018). The effect of abundance of natural resources on economic growth and the role of the quality of institutions. Agricultural Economics Research, 11(1), 175-192 [In Persian].
North, D.C. (2004). Understanding the process of economic change. Tekapo Specialized Scientific Quarterly. Translated by Ali Nasiri Aghdam, No. 11 and 12, 178-171 [In Persian].
Veblen, T. (2013). Affluent class theory. Farhang Ershad translation, Tehran, Nei Publishing House [In Persian].
Hayek, F. (2013). Legislation and freedom (volume 3: political order of free peoples). Translated by Moussa Ghaninejad and Mahshid Moiri, World Economic Publishing House [In Persian].