Examining and Explaining the Influencing Factors on the Different Decisions of Investors in Iran

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Economics, Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman, Iran.

2 Associate Professor of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Economics, Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman, Iran.

10.22103/jdc.2022.20398.1309

Abstract

Objective: Decision making is choosing one option from among several options. Every decision can have unique dimensions and results for every investor. Investors make different decisions in the same and different situations. The main purpose of the current research is to investigate the factors influencing the different decisions of investors in Iran.
Method: This research was carried out using the descriptive-correlation design and using the structural equation modeling approach. The statistical population of the research included university professors, financial experts, financial managers, managers of exchange and non-exchange companies, especially investment companies, real investors in the whole country, of which 390 people were selected by a simple random sampling method through a questionnaire. Face-to-face and online were selected. In order to collect data, a questionnaire tool was used, and structural equation modeling was used to test the hypotheses in two sections: evaluation of the measurement model and evaluation of the structural model.
 Results: The findings of the research showed that the variables of interests, financial resources, mental capabilities, goals, information, interaction and the way of analysis have a significant effect on the different decisions of investors at the 5% error level.
 
Conclusion: The results of this research showed that in order to predict the choice of each investor, interests as a driving engine, resources as a situation, neural mental structure as a system, goals as a tool, information as a feed, interaction as a facilitator, analysis as an action approach. he does. According to the results of this research, it is suggested that the decision-making body in the country should pay more attention to investors' decisions, because each decision will have different economic effects on each stakeholder group. Therefore, it is better for the decision-making body to use an interactive approach for investment issues. According to the research results, if we want to explain the different decision making of each person. In other words, let's predict the type of decision of each person, the engine driving the decision in the first criterion is interests. Interests act as the invisible hand in decision making. The interests of each investor state why the decision is made in this way. The second criterion explains the different decision making of financial resources investors. Different sources will put different conditions in front of each person. Without resources, investment decisions will not make sense. The third criterion is the process and mental structures of people. The mental process works like a system. If we consider the inputs the same for everyone, the report or output that is provided for each person will be different because of the different neural mental structure for each person. A different report will have a different decision. The fourth criterion is investment goals. Each target has individual means and methods of slaughter. Knowing the methods and tools can express the goals of an investor. Knowing more and better the methods and tools used by an investor will help in predicting the investment decision. The fifth criterion is the investor's information and awareness process. Information for decision-making plays the role of blood in the human body. When we decrease or increase the flow of information, the quality of decision-making will decrease or increase accordingly. Information is known as the feed for investor decision making. The sixth criterion that should be considered is the interaction of investors. Every investor will consciously or unconsciously be attracted to people who are almost at the same level as him. In other words, every person in his interaction tries to have a relationship with people who do not contradict his economic, cultural and intellectual level to face the challenge. Most people don't like change and try to maintain the current level, so knowing more about the interaction and communication of each investor will make it easier to predict decision making. The last criterion for predicting people's decision-making is the way of analysis. The analysis of each investor can be focused on profit per share, profit sharing, development plan, major shareholders, difference between daily value and intrinsic value, asset structure, debt and equity, operating cash flow, profit quality, financial cost, industry outlook, indicators The macro economy, the perspective of other investors, the security and health of investment, social responsibilities, the members of the board of directors and the CEO, the value chain and production, etc. When we find out the summary index of each investor, we can predict which option will be the decision and choice. According to the results of the research, each investor has different interests compared to other investors, the amount of financial resources can change the decision of each investor, the mental nervous structure of each investor is different from others, investment goals are determined according to the conditions of each investor, each group of special information compared to other groups, each investor has a unique interaction with others, each person's analysis is different from other people. At the end of the time, when the interests, financial resources, intellectual structure, goals, information, interaction and analysis of each investor are different from others, the investment decision of each investor will be different from each other. According to the results, it seems that the way investors make decisions is hierarchical. that the interest component is at the top of the pyramid and the analysis component is at the bottom of the pyramid, when the answer to the challenge of each level of the pyramid is not found, the decision is stopped, the rest of the steps are removed, no decision is made. The decision is implemented when there are no challenges without solutions for all levels. This research has investigated the different decisions made by investors in the capital market of Iran, at first, by using the research literature, the influencing factors on decision-making were discussed based on economic theory, behavioral finance, based on economic theory, investors behaved completely rationally and rationally when making decisions. and they always seek to maximize their profit, but based on behavioral finance, investors have not behaved completely rationally and when making decisions, they often make mistakes due to behavioral strain, these mistakes are caused by people's mental structures, which are the mental conditions and emotions of people, environmental conditions And it will lead to a difference in the decision making of the shareholders. Based on the results of this research, investors generally pay more attention to the benefits component than any other factor in the decision-making process. Benefits are very different compared to other components. This difference shows that interests have more weight in decision-making. Investors attach great importance to the component of interests in decisions. In the second stage, they evaluate financial resources, liquidity, working capital, cash inflow and outflow. Then they model ideas, mentalities, innovation and creativity, theories and theories in mental structures. The objectives of the decision-making matter are clarified. It will be collected from existing and available data and information that have the characteristics of being timely, reliable and verifiable. Investor interacts with people who can facilitate decision making for them. All conditions, leading position and previous steps will be summarized, classified, analyzed and interpreted. Therefore, the decision of each investor is made. According to the results of this research, understanding the way investors make different decisions, which are the most important pillars of this market, will lead to the growth and development of the capital market. Knowing the market elements plays an important role in the capital market process, efficiency, effectiveness and economy in the market will be better as a result in the whole country. On the other hand, knowing how each stakeholder group makes investment decisions will create an interactive approach for the decision-making body in relation to the establishment of laws, regulations, guidelines and instructions that will advance the entire market towards stable and secure growth and development. monitoring process due to the more predictable decision making of each group; It will become easier, more convenient and more effective for both supervisees and supervisors. Also, many behavioral strains will be solved for each group of investors. Investment security will increase for the decision maker. As a result, the amount of investment, production, and employment will increase and sustainable growth and development will be provided.

Keywords

Main Subjects


سعیدا اردکانی، سعید، بهلکه، آیناز؛ میرزاد، نگار و توسلی، طاهره‌السادات (1394). بررسی واکنش سرمایه‌گذاران نسبت به رویدادهای ناگهانی در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. تحقیقات مالی، 17(1)، 122-103 https://jfr.ut.ac.ir/article_52759_e27193811481344752594c26ac23f2ad.pdf.
بادآورنهندی، یونس و درخور، سعید (1392). بررسی رابطه بین محدودیت مالی، ارزش وجه‌نقد و خالص سرمایه‌گذاری. پژوهش‌های تجربی حسابداری، 2(8)، 189-167 https://jera.alzahra.ac.ir/article_578_a5972154e1e5823cf3f1e4b97ba1d2c8.pdf.
بادپا، بهروز و شیری، نعمت‌اله (1401). اثر مؤلفه‌های تصمیم‌گیری مالی و سرمایه‌گذاری بر قصد کارآفرینانه دانشجویان رشته حسابداری ایران. مجله دانش حسابداری، 13(3)، 88-65 https://jak.uk.ac.ir/article_3113_0765edcee695d05b8b99d070281a3dd4.pdf.
بینشیان، زهرا و دهدار، فرهاد (1397). ارائه مدل رابطه هوش مالی با گرایش‌های رفتاری و اثر آنها بر تصمیمات سرمایه‌گذاری بر اساس نظریه رفتار برنامه‌ریزی شده. دانش سرمایه‌گذاری، 7 (25)، 222-203 https://jik.srbiau.ac.ir/article_12124_c2a00157f70c73db963335dc206f48e3.pdf.
تک‌روستا، حسین (1401). بررسی مؤلفه‌های تأثیرگذار بر تصمیمات سرمایه‌گذاری صندوق بازنشستگی نیروهای مسلح. اقتصاد دفاع، 7(23)، 52-37 https://journals.sndu.ac.ir/article_1967_ad17c3834229f0a2e2cbc626dd43746e.pdf.
سینایی، حسنعلی؛ مرتضوی، سعید و تیموری اصل؛ یاسر (1384). پیش‌بینی شاخص بورس اوراق بهادار تهران با استفاده از شبکه مصنوعی. بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی،12(41)، 83-59 https://acctgrev.ut.ac.ir/article_18463_6b7f7841b56f612d84bb0d85fa12c8a5.pdf.
حاجیها، زهره و محمدی چم‌خانی، زهره (1396). حساسیت منابع خارجی به جریان وجه نقد در شرایط محدودیت‌های مالی داخلی و خارجی در شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس و اوراق بهادار تهران. مدیریت دارایی و تأمین مالی، 5(2)، 50-37 https://amf.ui.ac.ir/article_21572_5c353db025230c 550cd5261bd449ef26.pdf.
حساس‌یگانه، یحیی و خیرالهی، مرشد (1387). حاکیمت شرکتی و شفافیت. حسابدار، 203، 79-74 https://www.sid.ir/paper/466481/fa.
خدائی وله زاقرد،محمد و رستمی نوروزآباد، مجتبی (1395). واکنش‌پذیری تصمیم‌گیری سرمایه‌گذاران از کیفیت خرید الکترونیکی سهام. مطالعات مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، 4(16)، 61-35 https://journals.atu.ac.ir/article_6983_4e8d7f2d77bde38cdfda3c42f6aa4dd5.pdf.
خوشکار، فرزین؛ محمدرضایی، وحید و پناهی، رضا (1398). بررسی تأثیر افشای اطلاعات بر کیفیت حسابرسی و تصمیم‌گیری سرمایه‌گذاران. پژوهش در حسابداری و علوم اقتصادی، 3(4)، 20-11 https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/1611944.
آقایی، محمدعلی و مختاریان، امید (1383)، بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر تصمیم‌گیری سرمایه‌گذاران در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. بررسی‏‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 11(2)، 25-3 https://acctgrev.ut.ac.ir/article_10447_bcdd2fc6061fe3d490db6e9d9c394347.pdf.
ملانظری، مهناز؛ پارسایی، منا و تقی ملایی، سعید (1400). تأثیر تامین مالی از طریق استقراض بر تصمیم‌های سرمایه‌گذاری بر اساس تئوری حسابداری ذهنی. بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 28(4)، 738-713 https://acctgrev.ut.ac.ir/article_85114_e6822435162ebb49ffd103cdfe909e23.pdf.
میشل ام. پمپین (2006). دانش مالی رفتاری و مدیریت دارایی. ترجمه: احمد بدری، 1388، انتشارات کیهان، نوبت اول.
هاشمی، سیدعباس؛ امیری، هادی و افیونی، علیرضا (1396). بررسی نوسانات جریان‌های نقدی عملیاتی برسرمایه‌گذاری شرکت‌ها با در نظر گرفتن محدودیت تأمین مالی. مجله دانش حسابداری، 8(28)، 49-29 https://jak.uk.ac.ir/article_1646_743b96ea49906dced87ae00f14402169.pdf.
نمازی، محمد (1384). بررسی کاربردهای تئوری نمایندگی در حسابداری مدیریت. پیشرفت‌های حسابداری، 22(2)، 164-147 https://jaa.shirazu.ac.ir/ article_3477_b172b199570ffed6970b6477b39df4d1.pdf.
وکیلی‌فرد، حمیدرضا، فروغ‌نژاد، حیدر و خشنودی، مهدی (1392). ارزیابی رفتار سرمایه‌گذاران در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران با روش فرآیند تحلیل شبکه‌ای. مدیریت دارایی و تأمین مالی، 1(2)، 34-19 https://amf.ui.ac.ir/article_19847_ebfa26e4bfcbf96bb25a7cc5e9e10259.pdf.
یحیی‌زاده‌فر، محمود؛ علیقلی، منصوره و ذبیحی، فاطمه (1399). بررسی رابطه بین نقدشوندگی و کارایی سرمایه‌گذاری با توجه به محدودیت مالی و ریسک عملیاتی. تحقیقات حسابداری و حسابرسی، 12(45)، 22-5 https://www.iaaaar.com/article_107121_19203d19a4c4b7edae1ce83de623d32f.pdf.
References
Hajiha, Z., & Mohamadi Chamkhani, Z. (2017). The comparative investigation of the relationship between internal and external financial constraints in liquidity-intensive companies in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Asset Management and Financing, 5(2), 37-50 https://amf.ui.ac.ir/article_21572_5c353db025230c550cd 5261bd449ef26.pdf [In Persian].
Ady, S. (2018). The cognitive and psychological bias in investment decision-making behavior: Evidence From Indonesian investor’s behavior. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 10(1), 86 DOI: 10.22610/ jebs.v10i1.2092.
Akhter, T., & Hoque, M.E. (2022). Moderating effects of financial cognitive abilities and considerations on the attitude–intentions nexus of stock market participation. International Journal of Financial Studies, 10(1), 5 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs10010005.
Saeida Ardakani, S., Behlkeh, A., Mirzad, N., & Tavassoli, T. (2015). Investigating the reaction of investors to sudden events in Tehran Stock Exchange. Financial Research, 17(1), 122-103 https://jfr.ut.ac.ir/article_ 52759_e27193811481344752594c26ac23f2ad.pdf [In Persian].
Awais, M., Laber, M.F., Rasheed, N., & Khursheed, A. (2016). Impact of financial literacy and investment experience on risk tolerance and investment decisions: empirical evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(1), 73-79 https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/1414.
Badavarnhandi, Y., & Darkhor, S. (2013). Investigating the relationship between financial constraints, cash value and net investment. Accounting Empirical Research, 2(8), 189-167 https://jera.alzahra.ac.ir/article_578_ a5972154e1e5823cf3f1e4b97ba1d2c8.pdf [In Persian].
Badpa, B., & Shiri, N. (1401). The effect of financial decision-making and investment components on the entrepreneurial intention of accounting students in Iran. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 13(3), 65-88 https://jak.uk.ac.ir/article_3113_0765edcee695d05b8b99d070281a3dd4.pdf [In Persian].
Bakar, S., & Chui Yi, A. (2016). The impact of psychological factors on investors’ decision making in Malaysian stock market: A case of klang valley and Pahang. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 319-328 https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00040-X.
Banerjee, A. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3) 797-817 https://www.jstor.org/stable/2118364.
Bauer, P., & Yamey, B.S. (1957). The economic of underdeveloped countries. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Barua, S., & Chowdhury, A. (2009). General characteristics and investment determinants in bangladesh capital markets: Evidence from dhaka stock exchange. Finance and Tourism Management, 9(2), 138-161 https://ssrn.com/abstract=2283674.
Bhattacharya, N., Ecker, F., Olsson, P.M., & Schipper, K. (2012). Direct and mediated associations among earnings quality, information asymmetry, and the cost of equity. The Accounting Review, 87(2), 449-482 https://www.jstor.org/stable/23245611.
Bineshian, Z., & Dehdar, F. (2018). Presen the model of the relationship between Financial intelligence ehavioral trends and their impact on investors decisions based on the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Investment Knowledge, 7(25), 203-222 https://jik.srbiau.ac.ir/article_12124_c2a00157f70c73db963335dc206f48e3.pdf [In Persian].
Chen, T., Xie, L., & Zhang, Y. (2017). How does analysts' forecast quality relate to corporate investment efficiency? Journal of Corporate Finance, 43, 217-240 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.12.010.
Christiansen, C., Schroter,J., Rangvid, J., & Rangvid, J. )2007(. Are economists more likely to hold stocks? Reviewof Finance, 12(3), 465-496 https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfm026.
Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Gerardi, K., Goette, L., & Meier, S. (2010). Financial literacy and subprime mortgage delinquency: evidence from a survey matched to administrative data. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. Working Paper, 2010-10.
Geisler, M, & Allwood, C.M. (2018). Relating decision-making styles to social orientation and time approach. Behavioral Decision Making, 31(3), 415-429 DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2066.
Hala, Y., Abdullah, M.W., Andayani, W., Ilyas, G.B., & Akob, M. (2020). The financial behavior of investment decision making between real and financial assets sectors. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(12), 635–645 DOI: 10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no12.635.
Hechter, M. (1994). The role of values in rational choice theory. Rationality & Society, 6(3), 318-334 https://doi.org/ 10.1177/10434631940060030.
Hasas Yeganeh, Y., & Kheirollahi, M. (2008). Corporate governance and transparency. Accountant, 203, 74-79 https://www.sid.ir/paper/466481/fa [In Persian].
Hashemi, S.A., Amiri, H., & Efioni, A. (2016). Investigating the fluctuations of operational cash flows in investing companies, taking into account the limitation of financing. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 8(28), 29-49 https://jak.uk.ac.ir/article_1646_743b96ea49906dced87ae00f14402169.pdf [In Persian].
Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: areview of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195-204 https://www.jstor.org/stable/3094025.
Khodaee, M., & Rostami Norouzabad, M. )2016(. Investors' decision-making responsiveness of e-stock quality. Quarterly Journal of Information Technology Management Studies, 4(16), 35-61 https://journals.atu.ac.ir/ article_6983_4e8d7f2d77bde38cdfda3c42f6aa4dd5.pdf [In Persian].
Khoshkar, F., & Panahi, R. (2019). The effect of information disclosure on the quality of auditing and decision making of investors. Quarterly Journal of Research in Accounting and Economic Sciences, 3(4), 11-20 https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/1611944 [In Persian].
Kiser, E., & Hechter, M. (1998). The debate on historical sociology rational choice theory and its critics. American Journal of Sociology, 104(3), 758-791 https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/210086.
Lease, W.G., Lewellen, R.C., & Schlarbaum, G.G. (1977). Patterns of investment strategy and behavior among individual investors. Journal of Business, 50, 296-333 https://www.jstor.org/stable/2352539.
Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownershipstructure. Journal of Financial Economics, 4(3), 305-360 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.
Nagy, R.A., & Obenberger, R.W. )1994(. Factors influencing individual behavior. Financial Analysis Journal, 50(4), 63-68 https://www.jstor.org/stable/4479763.
Namazi, M. (2005). Investigating the applications of representative theory in management accounting. Accounting Advances, 22(2), 47-164 https://jaa.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3477_b172b199570ffed6970b6477b39df4d1.pdf [In Persian].
Neeli. M. (2013). Fundamentals of Economics. Publication.Tehran: Ney publication.
Michelle, M. Pompin. )2006.( Behavioral financial knowledge and asset management. Translation: Ahmad Badri, 2008, Kayhan Publications, first edition [In Persian].
Maditinos, D.I., Sevic, Z., & Theriou, N.G. (2007). Investor behavior in the athens stock exchange. Studies in Economics and Finance, 24(1), 32-50 DOI: 10.1108/10867370710737373.
Aghaei, M.A., & Mokhtarian, O. (2004). Investigating factors influencing investors' decision making in Tehran Stock Exchange. Accounting and Auditing Review, 11(2), 3-25 https://acctgrev.ut.ac.ir/article_10447_bcdd2fc 6061fe3d490db6e9d9c394347.pdf [In Persian].
Molanazari, M., Parsai, M., & Taghi Molei, S. (2021). The impact of financing through borrowing on investment decisions based on the theory of mental accounting. Quarterly Journal of Accounting and Auditing, 28(4), 713-738 https://acctgrev.ut.ac.ir/article_85114_e6822435162ebb49ffd103cdfe909e23.pdf [In Persian].
Rodrik, D. (2016). Economics rules: The rights and wrongs of the dismal science. Translated into Persian Mohammadreza Farhadi. Tehran: Asheyan Publication.
Scott, W.R., & O'Brien, P.C. (2003). Financial accounting theory. The Journal of Business, 72(1), 1-33.
Sinaii, H.A., Mortazavi, S., & Timouri Asl, Y. (2005). Prediction of Tehran Stock Exchange index using artificial network. Accounting And Auditing Reviews, 12(41), 83-59 https://acctgrev.ut.ac.ir/article_18463_ 6b7f7841b56f612d84bb0d85fa12c8a5.pdf [In Persian].
Tekrosta, H. (2022), Investigating the factors influencing the investment decisions of the Armed forces pension fund. Defense Economics Journal, 7(23), 52-37 https://journals.sndu.ac.ir/article_1967_ad17c3834229f0a2e2 cbc626dd43746e.pdf [In Persian].
Tenenhaus, M., Amato, S., & Esposito Vinzi, V. (2004). A global goodness-of-fit index for PLS structural equation modeling. Scientific Meeting, 739-742.
Vakilifard, H., Foroughnejad, H., & Khoshnodi, M. (2013). Evaluation of investors' behavior in Tehran Stock Exchange by network analysis process method. Quarterly Journal of Asset Management and Financing, 1(2), 19-34 https://amf.ui.ac.ir/article_19847_ebfa26e4bfcbf96bb25a7cc5e9e10259.pdf [In Persian].
Wayman, R. (2002). How to evaluate the ‘‘quality’’of EPS? www.investopedia.com/university/EPS.
Yahyazadeh Far, M., Aghili, M., & Zabihi, F. (2020). Investigating the relationship between liquidity and investment efficiency due to financial constraints and operational risk. Accounting and Auditing Research, 12(45), 5-22 https://www.iaaaar.com/article_107121_19203d19a4c4b7edae1ce83de623d32f.pdf [In Persian].