The Relationship between the Shadow Economy and the Elements of Competitiveness in Iran Using the Markov Switching-VAR

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Accounting, Hakim Toos Higher Education Institute Mashhad, Iran.

2 Department of Financial Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Roodehen Branch, Tehran, Iran.

10.22103/jdc.2023.20883.1350

Abstract

Objective: The economy of developing countries can be recognized by examining the two parts of the formal economy and the informal (shadow) economy. The official sector of the economy can be easily identified in the light of sources, reports and data contained in statistics and censuses, as well as by studying its structure, but the complex and invisible network of the shadow economy must be identified and evaluated with research studies and the role of quantitative and qualitative found this phenomenon in the country's economy. The purpose of this research is the analysis of the relationship between the shadow economy and the elements of competitiveness in Iran.
Method: The current research is applied in terms of purpose, descriptive-analytical in terms of inference method, and post-event in terms of the overall design of the research.
Results: The results showed that there is a significant relationship between the volume of the shadow economy and the shock on the input-oriented and efficiency-oriented elements of competitiveness in regime one (recession period) and the efficiency-oriented and creativity-oriented elements of competitiveness in regime two (boom period). The significance of input-oriented elements in regime two (boom period) and efficiency-oriented elements in regime one (recession period) was not confirmed.
Conclusion: Considering the impact of the size of the shadow economy and the shock on the input-oriented, efficiency-oriented and creativity-oriented elements of competitiveness, in different eras, it is suggested to provide economic platforms, so that we can witness the prosperity of economic indicators in our country. The shadow economy absorbs vital resources from the formal economy and partially prevents the implementation of policies that are necessary for the public interest. Also, the size of the shadow economy of the countries is different and even in some countries it exceeds a quarter of the gross domestic product (GDP). Although some shadow economies may have beneficial effects for some citizens or even the official economy of a country, in general, the shadow economy damages the country's competitiveness; Because it reduces the confidence of foreign investors in that country and, as a result, the possibility of their cooperation. On the other hand, competitiveness can provide incentives to bring underground operations to the surface and thus combat the undeclared economy. Using appropriate econometric methods, this research found evidence that the more competitive a country is, according to the global competitiveness index, its shadow economy becomes smaller (as a percentage of GDP). More precisely, as it was predicted, there is a negative relationship between the shadow economy and global competitiveness, and these results can help the relevant policy makers to curb the shadow economy with appropriate guidance towards increasing competitiveness. The country should help. A country that is interested in ensuring that its shadow economy will not expand; It should improve its competitiveness. Competition is a multidimensional and complex concept, especially when it refers to the national economy. Various indices of competitiveness describe its size and also its dimensions with regard to commercial activity, infrastructure and institutional environments and macroeconomics. At the same time, the competitiveness of a country primarily depends on its economic development, which in turn is affected by several factors. Some of these factors, such as investment, favorable business conditions, legal environment, etc., promote economic development, while others, such as low labor productivity, insufficient qualification of employees, etc., cannot meet the requirements of the labor market. They slow down the speed of economic development. Another thing that was confirmed in this research is the existence of a long-term relationship between the ease of doing business and the size of its shadow economy. In this regard, there is evidence that a country may be able to fight the shadow economy by increasing the ease of doing business. In fact, the shadow economy of a country is the result of the interaction between socio-economic development and its long-term psychological and cultural factors. Some of these factors can be considered and recognized as influential factors only with regard to the shadow economy and competition, but they cannot be significantly affected, at least in the short term. The issues can be considered in terms of the problem of people's mentality. A practical way to deal with the problem of the shadow economy, that is, to reduce the size of this phenomenon, is to promote socio-economic development and ease of doing business. When an economy is growing, ease of doing business also increases a country's competitiveness and most importantly, it helps to form a positive public attitude towards self-efficacy. By increasing business dynamism, developing skills, promoting the adoption of information and communication technology (ICT), increasing market size and infrastructure can be achieved. In addition, restrictive laws and higher living standards may lead to a reduction in the shadow economy. Higher levels of GDP also potentially provide a stronger financial system through macroeconomic stability and can provide more assistance in this area in addition to the guidelines that are formulated to curb unemployment. , because people can do transactions through the formal economy instead of the informal economy. In this regard, increasing exports as a percentage of GDP seems to be a useful tool to reduce the shadow economy. This is while reducing the consequences of the shadow economy through the ease of doing business and increasing GDP per capita and exports (as a percentage of GDP) is definitely a difficult task for the respective countries. However, achieving higher levels of (perceived) competitiveness is not inconceivable. According to the findings of the research, it can be generally stated that competitiveness is the ability of a country to maintain its relative advantages in order to support the economic growth and prosperity of its citizens, and the ease of doing business with the shadow economy are related.

Keywords

Main Subjects


آذرمند، حمید (۱۳۸۶). ارزیاب اقتصاد پنهان در ایران. حساب‌های اقتصادی ایران، 2(3)، 24-43 https://www.sid.ir/paper/484330/fa.
اسمعیل‌پوریان کاندستار، نجیب؛ محمدزاده موسی کندی، یوسف و محسنی زنوزی،سیدجمال‌الدین (۱۳۹۹). تأثیر درآمدهای نفتی و رشد پول بر روی اقتصاد سایه‌ای در ایران. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه ارومیه، https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir/#/articles/b4b65727bf8366f2982f00bafa0e5c95.
جعفری صمیمی، احمد؛ گیلک حکیم آبادی، محمدتقی و غیبی حاجی‌ور، سیاوش (۱۳۹۶). تأثیر نوسانات حق الضرب بر روی بخش زیرزمینی اقتصاد ایران: رهیافت DSGE. مطالعات و سیاست‌های اقتصادی، 13(1)، 3-28 https://economic.mofidu.ac.ir/article_32478.html.
رمضانپور،اسماعیل؛ زمانی، نرجس و رضائی پیته‌نوئی، یاسر (1403). تحریم‌های اقتصادی و مدیریت نقدینگی در شرکت‌ها. مجله توسعه و سرمایه، 9(1)، 99-83 https://jdc.uk.ac.ir/article_3755.html.
رنانی، محسن؛ میرزایی، محمد و اربابیان، شیرین (۱۳۹۱). بخش غیررسمی و ظرفیت مالیاتی از دست رفته (مطالعه موردی: استان کهگیلویه و بویراحمد). پژوهشنامه اقتصادی، 12(44)، 99-130 https://joer.atu.ac.ir/article_962.html.
شاه‌آبادی، ابوالفضل؛ کردبچه، حمید و شاهسوندی، هانیه (۱۳۹۹). اندازه‌گیری حجم اقتصاد زیرزمینی در کشورهای منتخب درحال‌توسعه دارای فراوانی منابع طبیعی. اقتصاد و تجارت نوین، 43(15)، 51-80 https://jnet.ihcs.ac.ir/article_6122.html.
شریفی، سیدمحمدرضا؛ حقیقت، علی؛ ابراهیمی، مهرزاد و امینی فرد، عباس (۱۴۰۱). بررسی اثر توسعه مالی و مالیات بر اقتصاد زیرزمینی؛ مطالعه موردی ایران. پژوهش‌های رشد و توسعه اقتصادی، 12(46)، 88-67 https://egdr.journals.pnu.ac.ir/article_6365.html.
شهاب، محمدرضا و پژویان، جمشید (۱۳۹۴). ارتباط بین اقتصاد سایه‌ای و رشد اقتصادی: یک تحلیل تجربی با استفاده از سیستم معادله‌های پنل همزمان. اقتصاد مالی، 30(9)، 28-1 https://journals.iau.ir/article_515777.html.
شهبازی، کیومرث؛ حسن‌زاده، خدیجه و خوش‌خبر، وحید (۱۳۹۹). اثرات نامتقارن اقتصاد سایه‌ای بر توسعه مالی در ایران با رویکرد مدل NARDL. پژوهش‌های رشد و توسعه پایدار (پژوهش‌های اقتصادی)، 20(1)، 185-204 https://ecor.modares.ac.ir/article-18-26146-fa.html.
صامتی، مجید، سامتی، مرتضی، و دلایی میلان، علی (1388). برآورد اقتصاد زیرزمینی در ایران (84-1344): به روش MIMIC. مطالعات اقتصاد بین الملل، 20(2)، 89-114 https://www.sid.ir/paper/458664/fa.
فلاحتی، علی؛ نظری، سهیلا و پشته‌کشی، مریم (۱۳۹۹). کیفیت نهادی، رانت منابع طبیعی و اقتصاد سایه‌ای. تحقیقات مدلسازی اقتصادی، 11(39)، 149-185 https://jemr.khu.ac.ir/article-1-1653-fa.html.
عمادزاده، مصطفی و رفیعی طباطبایی، زهرا (۱۳۹۱). تحلیلی پیرامون اقتصاد زیرزمینی و عوامل مؤثر بر آن در منتخبی از کشورهای توسعه یافته. پژوهشنامه اقتصاد کلان (پژوهشنامه علوم اقتصادی)، 7(13)، 83-96 https://jes.journals.umz.ac.ir/article_56.html.
‫کارازموده فرد، یونس؛ میرزاپور باباجان، اکبر؛ هادی‌زاده، آرش و اکبری مقدم، بیت‌الله (۱۴۰۰). رابطه علیت بین توسعه مالی و اقتصاد زیرزمینی در ایران: رویکرد MIMIC و علیت هسیائو. اقتصاد مالی، 57(15)، 165-186 https://www.sid.ir/paper/416636/fa.
References
Ajide, F.M., Dada, J.T., & Olowookere, J.K. (2022). Shadow economy and foreign direct investment in Nigerian manufacturing industry. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 23(2), 156-180 https://ideas.repec.org/-a/ids/ijecbr/v23y2022i2p156-180.html.
Azarmand, H. (2007). Evaluating the hidden economy in Iran. Economic Accounts of Iran, 2(3), 24-43 https://www.sid.ir/paper/484330/fa [In Persian].
Baklouti, N., & Boujelbene, Y. (2020). A simultaneous equation model of economic growth and shadow economy: Is there a difference between the developed and developing countries? Economic Change and Restructuring, 53(1), 151-170 https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/ecopln/v53y2020i1d10.1007_s10644-018-9235-8.html.
Devine, H. (2021). How institutions shape the informal economy. The Global Informal Workforce, Chapter 8, 223-252 https://www.elibrary.imf.org/display/book/9781513575919/ch009.xml.
Eilat, Y., & Zinnes, C. (2000). The shadow economy in transition countries: consequences for economic growth and donor assistance. Harvard Institute for International Development, CAER II Discussion Paper, 30(7), 1233-1254 https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/wdevel/v30y2002i7p1233-1254.html.
Emadzadeh, M., & Rafiei Tabatabaei, Z. (2012). An analysis of the underground economy and the factors affecting it in a selection of developed countries. Research Journal of Macroeconomics (Research Journal of Economic Sciences), 7(13), 83-96 https://jes.journals.umz.ac.ir/article_56.html [In Persian].
Enste, D.H. (2018). The shadow economy in OECD and EU accession countries–empirical evidence for the influence of institutions, liberalization, taxation and regulation: An international perspective. In book: Size, Causes and Consequences of the Underground Economy (pp.123-138), DOI: 10.4324/9781351149044-7.
Esmail Pourian Kandstar, N., Mohammadzadeh Musa Kandi, Y., & Mohseni Zenouzi, S.J. (2019). The effect of oil revenues and money growth on the shadow economy in Iran. Master's Thesis, Urmia University, https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir/-#/articles/b4b65727bf8366f2982f00bafa0e5c95 [In Persian].
Falahati, A., Nazari, S., & Poshteh Keshi, M. (2019). Institutional quality, rent of natural resources and shadow economy. Economic Modeling Research Quarterly, 11(39), 149-185 https://jemr.khu.ac.ir/article-1-1653-fa.html [In Persian].
Feige, E.L. (1997). Revised estimates of the underground economy: Implications of US currency held abroad. MPRA Paper 13805, University Library of Munich, Germany, https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/13805.html.
Frey, B.S., Weck, H., & Pommerehne, W.W. (1982). Has the shadow economy grown in Germany? An exploratory study. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 118(3), 499-524 https://www.jstor.org/stable/40439052.
International Monetary Fund. Research Dept. (2018). World economic outlook, April 2018: Cyclical upswing, structural change. International Monetary Fund.‏
Ishak, Phoebe W., & Farzanegan, M.R. (2022). Oil price shocks, protest, and the shadow economy: Is there a mitigation effect? Economics & Politics, 34(2), 298-321 https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12199.
Jafari Samimi, A., Gilak Hakimabadi, M., & Gheibi, S. (2017). The impact of seigniorage volatility on underground economy in Iran: A DSGE approach. The Journal of Economic Studies and Policies, 4(1), 3-28 https://economic.mofidu.ac.ir/-article_32478.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Karazmoodeh Fard, Y., Mirzapour Babajan, A., Hadizadeh, A., & Akbari Moghadam, B. (2021). Causal relationship between financial development and underground economy in Iran: MIMIC approach and Hsiao causality. Financial Economics, 57(15), 165-186 https://www.sid.ir/paper/416636/fa [In Persian].
Karpenko, I.V., Mazurenko, O.V., Spodin, S., Volynets, R., & Hladkovskyi, M. (2022). The nexus between international tax competitiveness and the shadow economy: A cross-countries analysis. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 1(42), 196–205. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.1.42.2022.3703.
Keegan, A., Bitterling, I., Sylva, H., & Hoeksema, L. (2018). Organizing the HRM function: Responses to paradoxes, variety, and dynamism. Human Resource Management, 57(5), 1111-1126 https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21893.
Medina, L., & Schneider, F. (2018). Shadow economies around the world: what did we learn over the last 20 years? International Monetary Fund, https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2018/01/25/Shadow-Economies-Around-the-World-What-Did-We-Learn-Over-the-Last-20-Years-45583.
Nguyen, D.V., & Duong, M.T.H. (2021). Shadow economy, corruption and economic growth: An analysis of BRICS countries. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(4), 665-672 DOI: 10.13106/-jafeb.2021.vol8.no4.0665.
Ogunc, F., & Yılmaz, G. (2000). Estimating the underground economy in Turkey. Research and monetary policy department, central bank of the republic of Turkey, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24134301-_Estimating_The_Underground_Economy_In_Turkey.
Omodero, C.O. (2019). The financial and economic implications of underground economy: The Nigerian perspective. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 8(2), 155-155 https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjz/ajisjr/1784.html.
Poufinas, T., Galanos, G., & Agiropoulos, Ch. (2021). The impact of competitiveness on the shadow economy. International Advances in Economic Research, 27(1), 29-46 https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/iaecre/v27y202-1i1d10.1007_s11294-021-09820-9.html.
Ramazanpoor, E., Zamani, N., & Rezaei Pitenoei, Y. (2024). Economic sanctions and liquidity management in companies. Journal of Development and Capital, 9(1), 83-99 https://jdc.uk.ac.ir/article_3755.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Renani, M., Mirzaei, M., & Arbabian, Sh. (2012). The informal sector and the lost tax capacity (Case study: Kohgiluyeh and Boyer Ahmad provinces). Economic Research Journal, 12(44), 130-99 https://joer.atu.ac.ir/-article_962.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Sahnoun, M., & Abdennadher, Ch. (2019). The nexus between unemployment rate and shadow economy: A comparative analysis of developed and developing countries using a simultaneous-equation model. Economics Discussion Papers 2019-30, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), https://ideas.repec.org/-p/zbw/ifwedp/201930.html.
Sameti, M., Sameti, M., & Dalali Milan, A. (2023). Estimating the underground economy in Iran (1965-2005): A MIMIC approach. International Economics Studies, 35(2), 89-114 https://www.sid.ir/paper/458664/fa [In Persian].
Schneider, B., & Bowen, D.E. (2019). Perspectives on the organizational context of frontlines: A commentary. Journal of Service Research, 22(1), 3-7‏ https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670518816160.
Shahabadi, A., Kordbache, H., & Shahsavanndi, H. (2019). Measuring the size of the underground economy in selected developing countries with abundant natural resources. Modern Economics and Business, 43(15), 51-80 https://jnet.ihcs.ac.ir/article_6122.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Shahiki Tash, M. N., Molaee, S., & Dinarzehi, K. (2014). Examining the Relationship between Economic Growth and Coefficient of Social Welfare under the Bayesian Approach in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Economic Growth and Development Research, 4(16), 52-41‏ 20.1001.1.22285954.1393.4.16.3.2 [In Persian].
Sharifi, S.M.R., Haghighat, A., Ebrahimi, M., Amini Fard, A. (2022). Examining the effect of financial development and taxation on the underground economy; A case study of Iran. Scientific Quarterly Journal of Economic Growth and Development Research, 12(46), 67-88 https://egdr.journals.pnu.ac.ir/article_6365.html [In Persian].
Shahab, M.R., & Pazhouyan, J. (2015). The relationship between the shadow economy and economic growth: An empirical analysis using a system of simultaneous panel equations. Financial Economics, 30(9), 1-28 https://journals.iau.ir/-article_515777.html [In Persian].
Shahbazi, K., Hassanzadeh, Kh. & Khosh Khabar, V. (2019). Asymmetric effects of shadow economy on financial development in Iran with NARDL model approach. Sustainable Development and Growth Research (Economic Research), 20(1), 185-204 https://ecor.modares.ac.ir/article-18-26146-fa.html [In Persian].
Schneider, F. (2011). Handbook on the shadow economy. Edward Elgar Publishing, https://econpapers.repec.org/-bookchap/elgeebook/13432.htm.
Soares, C., & Afonso, Ó. (2019). The non‐observed economy in Portugal: The monetary model and the MIMIC model. Metroeconomica, 70(1), 172-208 https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/metroe/v70y2019i1p172-208.html.
Svazas, M., Navickas, V., Bilan, Y., & Vasa, L. (2022). The features of the shadow economy impact’on biomass energy sector. Energies, 15(8), 2932 https://doi.org/10.3390/en15082932.
Tedds, L.M. (2018). Non-tax revenue for funding municipal governments: Take-up, constraints, and emerging opportunities. MPRA Paper 96919, https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/96919.html.
Tran, T.P.K., Nguyen, P.V., Nguyen, Q.L.H.T.T., Tran, N.P., & Vo, D.H. (2022). Does national intellectual capital matter for shadow economy in the Southeast Asian countries? Plos One, 17(5), e0267328 10.1371/journal.pone.0267328.
Wu, D.F., & Schneider, F. (2021). Nonlinearity between the shadow economy and economic development. IMF Working Papers 2019/048, International Monetary Fund, https://ideas.repec.org/p/imf/imfwpa/2019-048.html.
Younas, Z.I., Qureshi, A., & Al-Faryan, M.A.S. (2022). Financial inclusion, the shadow economy and economic growth in developing economies. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 62, 613-621 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2022.03.011.
Zaman, Gh., & Goschin, Z. (2015). Shadow economy and economic growth in Romania. Cons and pros. Procedia Economics and Finance, 22, 80-87 https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00229-4.